Dogma vs. Freedom
Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding
These different approaches have their own benefits and
disadvantages, as the reading explains.
Instrumental Understanding of Mathematics can provide the student with faux
confidence based on the practical procedures learnt, but once the conditions or
the framework rules change, the pupil would feel lost and disoriented, as in the
town map example. Relational understanding would demand that the student leave
the comfort zone of certainty and explore different ways to understand. This
will take more time and cross feelings, but from a life perspective, the skills acquired
will be transferable to other subjects and real-life problems.
As a teacher, I want to be able to be part of the autonomy
building of the students, and I think that requires getting out of my comfort
zone and becoming creative and efficient in my lesson planning in order to
maintain a relational understanding through the Math learning journey.
Your “dogma vs freedom” framing is powerful — it gives Skemp’s distinction fresh energy and makes your reflection stand out. I also liked how you connected this to your role as a teacher and the idea of building student autonomy. To make it even stronger, you could have tied in one or two more of Skemp’s specific examples. But overall this is a creative, personal, and insightful piece — excellent work.
ReplyDelete